this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
789 points (95.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9358 readers
648 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Highway spending increased by 90% in 2021. This is one of many reasons why car traffic is growing faster than population growth.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

It's identical to the bus, but has a very hard time moving on the tarmac.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Completely agree with your point, not trying to detract or anything, but why 69?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

It's divisible by both 3 AND 23. Only every 69th number has that property, so you could call it kinda rare.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Because it's just a nice number

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

TBF US highways are undermaintained and a collapse could endanger lives.

I'd rather have a railway expansion but we still gotta maintain whats been built.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's unsustainable. Your expectation for maintenance will not be met.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Expanding it is unsustainable. Maintaining major roads is not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That is premised on the notion that the expansion that has happened until the present is sustainable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It is moreso premised on the notion that highways and concrete passes/bridges have been recieving far insufficient maintenance for many years at a time.

I am not saying "replace every old road" I am just saying "keep important roads usable."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Do you know what "triage" is?

load more comments
view more: next ›