Fediverse

28248 readers

721 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What can ActivityPub do that RSS can't? (lemy.lol)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I know they're quite different technically. But practically, what does ActivityPub unlock that was not previously possible with RSS and basic web tech stack?

I think I have an idea of the answer. RSS may provide a way for users to "subscribe" to content from a feed, equivalent of following and putting it in a unified feed.

But it does not have a way for users to interact with the poster, like comments or likes. This may be possible with a basic web stack though, but either users will have to make accounts on every person's site, or the site has to accept no user auth. (but this could be resolved with a identity provider standard, like disqus does)

I suppose another thing activityPub does is distribute content to multiple servers. Not sure if this is really desirable though?

Anyways, did I miss anything?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This may be possible with a basic web stack

"basic web tech stack" is quite a bit hand-wavy, don't you think?

Yeah, indieweb sites could do a lot of things: authn and authz, content syndication, backlinking, Social Graph, etc. But none of them had been standardized and put into one single protocol. ActivityPub is precisely this protocol.

Saying that "we can do that with a basic web stack" is not that different from saying "we can have a protocol to publish XML content without styling using a basic web stack, why do we need RSS or Atom?"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You're right, it is hand wavy.

But I think it is valid for every blog to have things like comments and likes in their own way, if they're okay with users not being authenticated.

But yes, it makes sense this is where activity Pub shines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But I don't understand what you are trying to argue. Do you think that AP is only meant to be a single improvement about existing implementation for (micro)blogs?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Not arguing anything, just asking questions to confirm my understanding (and I believe I got my answers so we're good).

I don't know what you mean by single improvement, but I don't think that is my position, no.