this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

languagelearning

14395 readers
1 users here now

Building Solidarity - One Word at a Time

Rules:

  1. No horny posting
  2. No pooh posting
  3. Don't be an ass

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

In the era of classical and early modern literature, it was not uncommon to encounter sentences that unfurled like intricate tapestries, woven with clauses, phrases, and asides that nested within each other like Russian dolls, each turn and twist of syntax guiding the reader through complex arguments and detailed narratives, and this penchant for prolixity, this delight in the elaborate and the exhaustive, was not merely a stylistic choice but a reflection of the times, for in an age when books were scarce, and reading was a leisure pursued by the few, each sentence had to carry the weight of a paragraph, each paragraph the substance of a chapter, with authors like Henry James and Marcel Proust spinning sentences that stretched over pages, their clauses strung together with a maze of commas, semicolons, and dashes, leading the reader through convoluted paths of thought and emotion, and this style, this grandiloquent mode of expression, served not only to demonstrate the writer's mastery over language but also to engage the reader's attention and intellect in an intimate dance of comprehension and reflection, whereas today, in the digital age, where information bombards us from screens of all sizes, where the pace of life has accelerated and attention spans have shortened, writing has adapted to this new reality, becoming more direct, more concise, more fragmented, mirroring the rapid-fire exchange of texts and tweets, favoring clarity and brevity over complexity and depth, a shift that reflects not a degradation of language but an adaptation to the changing modes of communication and consumption, a reflection of our times where efficiency is prized over eloquence, where readers no longer have the luxury of languishing over lengthy sentences but instead demand quick, accessible information, leading to a landscape of writing that values the punchy over the ponderous, the succinct over the sprawling, a trend that, while lamented by some as the downfall of literature, is merely the latest evolution in the ever-changing story of language and expression, demonstrating once again that writing, like all forms of art, is a mirror to the society and the times in which it is produced.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I don't want to throw any shade on the art you just made, that felt good to read aloud, I am wondering though if it isn't "proper" to end sentences "early" or even that it isn't "wrong" to continue them too long.

I'm way less educated on "proper" grammar rules than I feel like I should be to ask this question but... Isn't that right there strictly a run-on sentence?

There are a couple places where it feels like the sentence ends and after the comma, another sentence begins. Such as:

...each paragraph the substance of a chapter. With authors like Henry James and Marcel Proust..."

or another place:

"...modes of communication and consumption. A reflection of our times where efficiency..."

Or is there no grammatical "rule" setting absolute limits on the length of a sentence?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

Neither of those splits are really valid as is, if the meaning is to be retained.

The "with authors" clause as originally written is a continuation referring to what came before, but starting a new sentence that way suggests it will refer to what follows. Similarly, the "reflection of our times" clause is a restatement of what came before—an apposition. This could be done with a new sentence, but it would need a demonstrative pronoun to clarify that: "This is a reflection....".

Better points for new sentences are where "and" joins clauses. For example:—

[...] thought and emotion, and this style, this grandiloquent mode of expression, [...]

could easily become:—

[...]thought and emotion. This style, this grandiloquent mode of expression, [...]

since the demonstrative back-reference is already present.

load more comments (2 replies)