Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
They mostly are, they are mostly just mean names propped up by lies/conspiracy theories. The tactics used by the MSM against Trump and a bully or abusive parent are almost identical.
The one thing we agree on is that Trump is not a conservative, so I'll take that common ground with you. He is comically farther to the left than almost anybody in the MAGA camp.
What about MSM like Fox
Mean names like "felon" and "rapist" and "insurrectionist" and "traitor"? Those sorts of mean names.
Appropriate names...
Yes
Those aren't names, they are factual descriptions.
I mean he has been proven in a court of law to be at least 2 of those, so... you know...
Trump's recent non-civil convictions will very likely be overturned on appeal.
He's bragged about gropping women. The fuck do you want?
Consensual fingering becomes rape when Trump does it 😂
Proving this is the only honest thing Trump has ever said.
Maybe you could call him a “gropper” instead?
Not at all likely, and until then, is still 100% factually accurate.
That still leaves "rapist" as indisputably factually accurate.
Not indisputably, as that was a civil case and therefore does not require evidence of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. If there was stronger evidence, he likely would have been tried criminally instead.
I’m starting to think these dems don’t take rape seriously, given how they failed to try to criminally convict someone they know is a rapist.
Who are you referring to here?
I'm a conservative but I'll admit that Democrats seem to care more about rape than Republicans. Most rape apologist rhetoric actually comes from the right not the left.
I’m referring to the fact that they know for sure Donald Trump is a rapist, but they’re not using whatever evidence convinced them of this fact to bring a criminal conviction.
Sounds like they’re not taking the obvious next step, given they know he raped someone.
This is, in case you’re going to commit to the playing dumb, not my actual point. My actual point is that while people want to believe it, they don’t have the actual reason to believe it, which is known as evidence.
You think evidence is why leftists call Trump a rapist? Ha!