this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
100 points (85.7% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1344 readers
42 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

All from in this thread in [email protected] about a chant at a British music festival where an artist said "death, death to the IDF".

After other users were quoting that chant in the comments and had comments removed and banned, the hero of our story, @[email protected] (appearing as "acargitz") pointed out that under international law, fighting an occupying force is legitimate. But apparently not under world news rules, as their removed comments and the many explanations from mods make clear in the thread.

Equally against the rules is the call for the eradication of an organisation or business, even without an explicit call to violence against individual members of the business.

In the same thread: user @[email protected] had comments removed for being anti-American "(again)", though I couldn't see the first time. It's not even clear to me how the removed comments were anti-American.

Bonus points for the "DC Comics" removal reason. Though this seems to be incompetence, rather than malice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

But I thought you said facts were encouraged?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, not a maniac and attacking mods is a rule 6 violation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

attacking mods is a rule 6 violation

So not all facts are encouraged after all? 🤣

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you can state a fact without actually attacking another user, sure. For some folks that's harder than it seems.

Where people get confused is we do allow attacking the subjects or authors of the articles, that's A-OK.

Some article about the new "Big Beautiful Bill" and someone goes off on how everyone who voted for it is a fucking idiot who's destroying our country? That's fine. Suggesting they're traitors who need to be rounded up and killed? Not fine. Suggesting they're traitors who need to be rounded up and placed under the RICO act? Again, that's fine.

A lot of folks just report bad language, which is ignored most of the time. The only time it's actionable is when it's directed at another user or obvious slurs like "r-redacted".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

So if a mod is a fucking genocide apologist or a "fucking maniac" , he cannot be called as such?

Let's assume he is constantly lying about answering question - can he be called a "fucking liar"?

Let's also assume he has nil understanding of international law or self defence yet he claims otherwise - is calling him "arrogant stupid bastard" permitable?