OpenStreetMap community

4182 readers

1 users here now

Everything #OpenStreetMap related is welcome: software releases, showing of your work, questions about how to tag something, as long as it has to do with OpenStreetMap or OpenStreetMap-related software.

OpenStreetMap is a map of the world, created by people like you and free to use under an open license.

Join OpenStreetMap and start mapping: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.

There are many communication channels about OSM, many organized around a certain country or region. Discover them on https://openstreetmap.community/

https://mapcomplete.org/ is an easy-to-use website to view, edit and add points (such as shops, restaurants and others)

https://learnosm.org/en/ has a lot of information for beginners too.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Can I assume orthoimagery is the best for tracing buildings? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm trying to correct local buildings on OSM. I've noticed that some of the buildings were traced before according to one set of satellite images, but are off according to others. One of the options for a background while editing that I've got is called orthoimagery. Can I assume that that is the best set of satellite images for tracing buildings from?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Short answer: yes

Pretty much all of the imagery options available on ID are orthoimagery, since that just means it's been corrected to remove distortions from camera angle, lens, and topography.

Unfortunately, that doesn't always make them perfectly accurate. The only good way to check if a particular dataset is accurate is to record GPS along a feature identifiable in the imagery and check out the offset.

Usually the best one to use is a more local survey that covers just the city (usually only done for larger cities). Also ones where the area you're tracing has a more "overhead" camera angle (hard to trace when the top of tall buildings are very offset from their base).

I think the RapID editor automatically provides a few additional local imagery sets, depending on where you are working.