electoralism

22150 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to c/electoralism! politics isn't just about voting or running for office, but this community is.

Please read the Chapo Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Shitposting in other comms please!

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

“Look, this is a 911 moment for the Democratic Party, in the sense that he’s an antisemitic socialist” (thehill.com)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

47 comments fedilink hide all child comments

first few paragraphs

spoiler

Pollster Mark Penn, a longtime adviser to the Clintons, on Wednesday described Zohran Mamdani’s victory in the New York City Democratic mayoral primary as a “911 moment” for the party.

In an interview on Fox News’s “America’s Newsroom,” the chairman of The Harris Poll said those who don’t want to see Mamdani win in November should target him both for his refusal to condemn calls to “globalize the intifada” and for his far-left economic policies.

“Look, this is a 911 moment for the Democratic Party, in the sense that he’s an antisemitic socialist,” Penn said, when asked which angle would be more effective to use against him.

“I think you have to throw both of those things at him because he has really not disavowed the global intifada. He has not really disavowed his comments that we should seize the means of production,” Penn continued.

“He is perhaps the most extreme major candidate ever to win such a major office,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Would actually love to know how chuds respond to a forced choice question like "Who do you support more, 9/11 or the Democratic Party?"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Both leftists and chuds answering "9/11" might be the final boss of horseshoe theory.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (12 children)

Is everyone in this comment section doing a bit, or did that event make our brains incapable of ever again that sequence of digits as "nine one one" (the phone number)?

I'm genuinely curious, because, I admit, I immediately see "nine eleven" until I read more closely, so I assume others must be making that reading error too.

Edit: I guess this question should have been directed to @[email protected] and @[email protected]

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In my case it's not clicking past the headline, mea culpa

I've just been peeved by comments from Gillibrand and the Republicans earlier this week so I jumped the gun.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The sentence also makes complete sense by both interpretations, because nine-eleven was an emergency.

All nine-elevens are nine-one-ones, but not all nine-one-ones are nine-elevens.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, from your comment I had thought there was some audio making me look like a fool (still didn't click past the headline to check obv)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I didn't see any audio or video in the article. He could very well have said "9/11" and the authors left out the forward slash by mistake or thinking it unnecessary.

load more comments (10 replies)