this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
405 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

59378 readers
3459 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
405
Musk's X sues advertisers over alleged 'massive advertiser boycott'. (www.voanews.com)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
70 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Archive.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This requires proof for collusion, does it not?

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I would think. And if that proof exists, it will come up at the appropriate time during legal proceedings. I'm skeptical there is any.

I guess they could call the entire existence of GARM to be collusion; companies banding together to "punish" companies who don't follow their guidelines. But X is (was?) a voluntary member of GARM, so it seems that would be a difficult argument for them to make without implicating themselves too.