this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
1486 points (97.3% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26781 readers
2977 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Is one of the other words associated with 200 years of chattel slavery?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And things even worse than slavery towards them. And that a lot of racists who would likely shoot black people still use that word on purpose. And that there's still a lot of those people.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Probably no, not in this specific form, that being said I don't want to compare one tragedy to another. There are lots of disgusting parts of the human history, and that's certainly one of them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The only equivalent I can think of starts with k and is a slur for Jewish people, and it's much less commonly heard.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Ironically enough, that word was coined by Jewish people who had been in the US for generations to describe newly-arrived Jews from Eastern Europe. Still offensive but somewhat different from the n-word.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What about something related to the indigenous peoples of the Americas?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

"Savages", "Redskins”, "Squaw", and so on.

Some news headlines even refer to the second one as "the R-word":

CNN: The terrible R-word that football needed to lose

Politico: The R-Word Is Even Worse Than You Think

These are extremely harmful words with hundreds of years of genocide behind them. I imagine the only reason they aren't censored like the N-word is is because Native Americans make up a proportionally smaller population due to the effectiveness of the genocide, and because the reservation system is in contrast to racial integration as with American black people in so much as it limits interactions between them and racist whites who would overuse a dehumanizing phrase to the same extent.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We killed them and displaced the rest so damn fast that we forgot all the major slurs for them

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Negro is pretty gosh darn close, but I guess it's just not quite as derogatory.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

It's weird being told that a regular color in your native language could get you beat up to a pulp in another country.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

To my non-American ears "negro" sounds far worse actually. Probably because of how rare it is in comparison.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I agree with you. But after studying Spanish I understand the origin of the word, so I'm somewhere in the middle on it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It was used in place of black for a longer period, and wasn't necessarily considered a slur in and of itself. But of course if you say it with a sneer, even "black" can be used as an insult.

For example a lot of books (even written by people of color) used "negro" and "coloured" etc. interchangeably up to the mid-late 20th century. But in modern context very few people use it in a manner that isn't derogatory.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I still have trouble referring to a person as 'black'. It feels like a slur, or at least an inappropriate racial caricature (they're not really black!) and it still surprises me that it's become the acceptable and inoffensive term.

The n word almost seemed more mild, being about the same thing (an inappropriate way to describe race from skin colour), but linguistically removed (I'm not a native Latin speaker*) so I can feel it's just a word, no need to be intrinsically good or bad.

  • Or Spanish, whatever
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

From my experience, black people want to be called black. I'm a white kid, but was raised in a foster family with three black siblings and other black family, including some that lived in a ghetto in another city. It was the 90s and early 2000s, so we watched some BET, we watched the Boondocks, we listened to thug rap, we watched shows with black characters such as All That and Cousin Skeeter. Because it was all a part of my brothers' culture, and they felt attached to it, and "black culture" was cool to all of us. And in anything we participated in I've never heard a single African-American who didn't call themselves "black" and be fine being called that. Maybe there are some rich people like Obama or Tom of The Boondocks who wouldn't call themselves "black", but they seem to be of a different lifestyle and culture than that.

I've also sometimes made the argument in defense of "black", that "African-American" is mildly politically-incorrect itself— not that I have a problem with the term, just the hyper-vigilant enforcing of it. Because it's not synonymous with skin color itself, it's a statement about where they came from. We don't call white people "European-Americans"; and what do we call non-black African-Americans from, say, Egypt or South America? So... yeah.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That makes sense.

I'm not American; never been to America. So I grew up with different culture. The dark skinned ethnicities near me were mainly Pakistani, and I don't remember if they were happy to be called black or not. I think we basically grew up feeling like you have to ignore skin colour, the same way you ignore the size of someone's nose. We weren't supposed to see it as any more different than someone else is from Wales, and someone else is very tall, and someone else lives in this or that neighborhood - but to comment on 'black' skin or big nose might give offence.

I agree 'African-American' is an awkward term also, as you say.

I suppose part of the difference is the black community in America, as I understand it, has a very strong cultural identity, whereas when I grew up the idea was basically that your ethnicity was another part of your background, but not your community identity. A British Indian is a Brit who happens to have Indian heritage, that they may like to hold close or may like to distance from: but we're all British. And someone from South Kensington might talk all posh an' all; and a Scouser's gonna Scouse: but we're all British. That sort of thing. (And if you're not British we still welcome you just as fondly; and to do otherwise would also be racist.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah, black Americans have a very distinct culture. Started as slaves, were segregated in a lot of ways, they still often have ghetto neighborhoods, they created unique genres of music with strong black identity and they still have their own entertainment catered towards them. That's America for you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

How about when people they don't think they're racist whisper it? I hate and love that.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To my Hispanic ears, "n---o" sounds like an Anglophone saying "black". Even when used derogatorily, my immediate first thought is that they pronounced it incorrectly, then the rest of the associated matters kick in and I realize what they are really saying.

Imagine if in the Hispanosphere , the word "black" was almost synonymous with the n-word.

But yeah, don't use n---o in English to refer to or describe anyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Call up the UNCF and let them know immediately!

(Yes, I know they mostly brand themselves as the United Fund now.)