this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

1001 readers
52 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello Lemmygrad. I'm trying to understand the labour theory of value, and one thing I'm wondering about is the value of 'status symbols'. For commodities like this, it seems the price is always higher than the same commodity that's not a status symbol (like fancy cars or whatever). Those commodities seem to have disproportionately more value than the extra labour needed for the non status symbol version. How does LTV explain that?

My thinking is that LTV assumes that people will choose the cheaper between two equivalent commodities, but the opposite is actually true for status symbols (like, between 2 necklaces that are exactly the same, demand for the more expensive one will actually be higher). Does that sound about right? Or am I missing something deeper?

I should really get around to reading Capital...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I highly recommend the new translation of Capital by Paul Reitter. It took me literal years to finish Vol 1 the first time (I believe it was the Moore/Aveling one seen on Marxists.org, if so I can't speak to the quality of Fowkes'). I'm rereading the Reitter translation and it flows so much better. Also has a professionally-produced audiobook out already.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks for the recommendation! Just the first few paragraphs are already much clearer.