1
So Diddy is pretty much walking free. Amerikkka ain't beating the ingrained misogyny allegations.
(hexbear.net)
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
1 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13925 readers
171 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I didn't really follow this, but if a jury said not guilty isn't it at least somewhat reasonable to assume the evidence wasn't that strong? Or I guess the prosecution could have intentionally made a weak case, but idk
I figured he would go down hard as a scapegoat for the rest of the (white) people involved. Maybe Diddy had enough blackmail or something to wiggle out of it, but also I'm not quick to assume the jury got it wrong if they got to see evidence and hear testimony we didn't. I typically just trust a jury more than the prosecution, cops, government in general, etc.
Politely, juries are full of morons who couldn't skip jury duty and busybodies who want to judge others.
They screen specifically for that. You need to be the type of person they perceive to not be on any side so if you show strong reactions to something you won’t make it. Fence sitters, or “centrists” are very much preferred.
In a satanically fascist society screening for neutral individuals gives you the most satanically fascist treatlerites to ever walk the earth