this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
82 points (91.0% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2653 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

There is no context in which "more dead people is not a worse outcome" is a moral answer.

And the context in which you said that saving one life during the Holocaust didn't matter?

I'd say most people here would be absolutely willing to save a single person's life from genocide.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

You're not understanding what I was saying (or you're continuing to try to intentionally misrepresent what I was saying).

Using your analogy, you're the one saying 6 million deaths is acceptable as long as it doesn't get to six million and one. You're trying to simultaneously say we need to accept mass slaughter to avoid mass slaughter, it's nonsense.

The "six million deaths" are happening in Gaza right now. They are actually suffering and dying, but you're telling us we should accept that since you're afraid of not being able to kick the political can down the road and kerp pretending everything can be fine.

It doesn't matter, I can't make you understand why rewarding the Democrats for genocidal fascist policy is a losing strategy when they're suppose to be the alternative to genocidal fascists. You either let yourself understand it or you don't.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Using your analogy, you’re the one saying 6 million deaths is acceptable

That is not what I am saying at all. If you're going to accuse me of intentionally misrepresenting what you're saying, don't do it to me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, what you said was that it doesn't matter if Palestinians are being genocided only by Israel, or simultaneously by Israel and The USA.

The latter results in significantly more civilian deaths in Palestine. To you, these lost lives don't matter, because genocide is apparently equally bad no matter how many people die...

Which is just to say that "genocide" in your worldview is just a buzzword you use to attack people with, and not an actual atrocity that ought to be opposed.