this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
605 points (97.9% liked)

World News

38578 readers
2051 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

How do the algorithms of Facebook and Instagram affect what you see in your news feed? To find out, Guardian Australia unleashed them on a completely blank smartphone linked to a new, unused email address.

Three months later, without any input, they were riddled with sexist and misogynistic content.

Initially Facebook served up jokes from The Office and other sitcom-related memes alongside posts from 7 News, Daily Mail and Ladbible. A day later it began showing Star Wars memes and gym or “dudebro”-style content.

By day three, “trad Catholic”-type memes began appearing and the feed veered into more sexist content.

Three months later, The Office, Star Wars, and now The Boys memes continue to punctuate the feed, now interspersed with highly sexist and misogynistic images that have have appeared in the feed without any input from the user.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yes, so much this! I always believed that in the mobile internet era it would still be like this except we would be able to access it everywhere. Instead all we have is "platforms". 🙁😡

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

whats weird to me is that the kids today seem to require an 'app' per website . this requirement of their own choosing seems to lock them into whatever platform

as an old person familiar with browsers since lynx, its baffling

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apps aren't even that bad an idea, by themselves. Transmitting only the actual information and not the entire UI every time is a good idea, even more so if the apps are FOSS and the services have open APIs (which admittedly is the exception).

I grew up with IRC and of course everyone seriously using it used a standalone IRC client, not a browser chat interface.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

but the difference is between using an irc client to connect to any irc server and using ICQ to connect only to that one service.

we purposefully updated browsers to enable dynamic content for exactly the reason you propose...efficiency. i cant count how many sites converted to ajaxy-goodness so we dont have to redraw the whole ui. we spent 20 years building 'mobile-aware' websites so devices with different screens could handle the same site without problem.

i still get from the children, 'is there an app for your site?' yep; firefox.