Fediverse

28380 readers

812 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

new sharkey instance now open: cyberpunk.gay (cyberpunk.gay)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cyberpunk.gay is now open for registrations!!!

WHO ARE WE? we’re a scrappy little fresh-faced underdog instance of sharkey (a misskey fork). we have but one humbly stated mission: to put the PUNK back into cyberpunk on the fediverse

WHO AM I? i’m vanta. trans enby girl polyam lesbian gender terrorist, the fediverse’s favorite pirate radio DJ, DIY clothing auteur, and rogue wordsmith extraordinaire. i’ve been posting on fedi heavily since 2017

THREADS? not only is this instance a fedipact instance that has threads.net blocked, but… i’m the one who made the whole pact to begin with lmao

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Kinda a dick response to what was a considerately, sensitively asked question.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

the dickishness is likely due to that last paragraph:

I'd guess the shitty comments are from people dismissing this as a pile of buzzwords, hopefully if they can understand better then they'll be less shitty :)

this makes it seem like the fault for the chuds behavior relies on op for not being clear enough with their labels, as opposed to with the chuds deciding that someone's chosen self descriptors are somehow incorrect.

this is not helped by how bigots excuse their behavior as just wanting a Fair and Rational Discussion™, ignoring that what they want to "discuss" about is the validity of someone's whole existence.

[+] [email protected] -14 points 4 months ago (5 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

typical

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Evidence that marginalized individuals are just as capable of asshol-ish behavior as the majority.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

You also were not required to answer at all...

Honestly this hostility is off putting.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

But “non-binary girl” was not included in your description. But I guess one could have searched the other words.

Anyways, new instance sound cool. Hope it goes well. Also, fuck threads, amen.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

It certainly isn't a paid role, but in my experience those who seek to marginalize often do so with a whole lot of ignorance involved.

You continue to be under no obligation to help educate the blind, but if you knew going into this that some people would have comments and questions about the impressive number of labels you've applied to yourself, it just feels like you're setting yourself up to get mad on the internet at this point. Otherwise why bother including them in your post at all?