science

14658 readers

224 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Can the James Webb Space Telescope see galaxies over the universe's horizon? (www.space.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

hmm, light on answers but interesting questions

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago (2 children)

"If the universe would just sit still, then light from a galaxy 33.8 billion light-years away would take 33.8 billion years to reach us, and that would be that. But, in the early 1900s, Edwin Hubble found that distant galaxies appeared to be receding away from each other, and the further apart they were, the faster they were going. In other words, the universe isn't static; it is expanding"

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Btw, the whole measuring expansion via redshift, EM waves aren't affected by the expansion? Because expansion would be 3D (not 2D) and we and our devices would get "bigger" too, not experiencing any difference...

Edit: getting downvoted for questioning my understanding...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Disclaimer: I could be wrong or not up to date, but this is my current understanding.

On the small scale, forces like electromagnetism and gravity pull things together much much faster than the rate of cosmological expansion. That's why "we" don't expand, and neither does our frame of reference. There's a potential end to the universe where the rate of cosmological expansion (which increases over time) finally exceeds gravity and electromagnetism and eventually even the strong force, causing everything to fly apart forever.

Light waves propagate through spacetime itself, and basically it ends up being that there's nothing pulling it back from expanding as the space it travels expands.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If the universe isn't 33.8 billion years old, how did that light make it here in 33.8 billion years?

Genuine question, I hope the article answers it. Bookmarking this for later while I return to writhing in bed recovering from a stomach bug...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The galaxy is 33 billion light years away now but the light started coming toward is when it was 13 billion light years away. The article is basically an introduction to this concept mentioned toward the end of the article:

"To avoid confusion, astronomers actually use two distance measurement scales: a co-moving distance that eliminates the expansion of the universe as a factor and a proper distance that includes it. That means the co-moving distance of JADES-GS-z14-0 is 13.5 billion light-years, while its proper distance is 33.8 billion light-years."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Oh, gotcha, thanks for responding. That makes a lot of sense. Space at that scale gets so weird with timey wimey stuff

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oops ! That article citation mixed them up ... the comoving is the 33.8 one here ... while the light travel distance is the 13.5.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

I am just guessing, but if a galaxy was 10 billion light years away when the light left the galaxy it would appear to be 10 billion light years away, but in an expanding universe that galaxy also moved away from us for 10 billion years. So, appearing 10 billion years away today might mean it's 30 billion light years away right at this moment in time.