this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
301 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

59429 readers
3027 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
301
A fake recording of a candidate saying he’d rigged the election went viral. Experts say it’s only the beginning (edition.cnn.com)
submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A fake recording of a candidate saying he’d rigged the election went viral. Experts say it’s only the beginning::Days before a pivotal election in Slovakia to determine who would lead the country, a damning audio recording spread online in which one of the top candidates seemingly boasted about how he’d rigged the election.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I'm sure commercial generative AI companies would be required to embed invisible/inaudible watermark in the generated contents soon, similar with how spotify and apple music watermarking songs in their streaming platform.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Doesn’t look like Spotify or Apple watermark music, although that author used them as a hypothetical example.

Universal Music Group used to but moved away from the practice, it seems.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Dangerous approach.

Bad actors will not watermark their output, or remove the watermark. All watermarking does is lend credibility to misinformation. It's literally worse than nothing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It won't stop bad actors, but it'll allow AI companies to cover their asses to avoid being blamed for misuse of their tech, which is one of the reason I think most AI companies will use it soon.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I'm sure you're right on that. I think it's already done.