this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
55 points (95.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43864 readers
1403 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think i did once, but this was honestly a question i could have found the answer to on their site i just didnt wanna look

its always some vague bullshit that doesnt help

dunno im just kinda mad that they shove this shit in your face, make it hard to get to a real person

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Every time I do a search, the bot usually provides enough info. The problem is that I don't trust the bot because it's been wrong before. So I still need to continue the search to find an authoritative answer.

That's the problem with bots. If you trust their answers and they're wrong, it can be a real problem. There was a story a while ago about an Air Canada customer service bot that was giving out bad info about bereavement travel. When a customer tried to get the promised refund, the airline admitted the advice was wrong, but claimed the bot was a separate legal entity, therefore they were not responsible for the advice it gave.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

I like the approach this dev is taking with his PDF search app:

You can search in natural language, but it doesn’t try to give you an answer. It simply highlights what’s already there, even when you didn’t know the exact phrasing used in the source document.

Software can try to give me a summary with citations, but I’m gonna have to click the citations. So forget the summary, just show what would be cited! Great tech, all local in this case - hard to be “anti-AI” (common sentiment) when AI can just mean “search real good no matter which words you use.”

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

It should be noted that the guy sued Air Canada and won. But yeah, companies will definitely still try this same shit and not everyone wants to go through a lawsuit...