Technology

59331 readers

4641 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

142

AI's Future Hangs in the Balance With California Law (gizmodo.com)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

72 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Does that apply to any other type of technology, or are they just witch hunting?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

any other type of technology

Are there, for example, nuclear weapons available for general use?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

What kind of straw-man fallacy is that?

Please be rational.

Nuclear power keeps lots of people lights on. Same a AI technology is already making lots of people live better. For instance, in my country the IRS equivalent is already using it to successfully detect fiscal fraud.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's not a straw man. Nuclear technology is highly regulated.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I do not know how regulations come into play. But I'm OK with regulating technology according to its potential (real, not imagined) risk.

What I'm not OK with is with primitivism.