Digital Art

7038 readers

1 users here now

Community rules:

Be respectful and considerate in comments.
No deliberately offensive or inappropriate content.
Traditional artists and posts are also welcome here.
All posts must properly credit the original artist.
Please use the tickbox to mark any NSFW content.
No A.I. generated dreamscapes for now, as those are at best unethically sourced in the current state.
No furry related art.

How to post:

Please follow the convention of the images already uploaded so far i.e.:

Image title by Artists Name

In the description link the source to the image, and also include a direct link to the artists gallery. See previous posts for examples.

What to post:

You can post your own work here, but avoid spamming.

You can post your favourite peices here for us all to enjoy.

All artworks are copyright of the artists named in the posts.

Artists gallery links may contain NSFW works.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Moon render by me with ultra high surface detail. [4K] (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Test render from a very simple blender animation i am working on as early blender learning project.

Feel free to use as you please. Textures courtesy NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio

Render and texture edits by me, made with Blender.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Using a different height texture explains the different results. Odd, that the Arizona State University has more bumps than NASA at the same 64ppd resolution. Do you think they added noise to the NASA data? When I add noise to the height map in Blender, I can make it look like this.