this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
656 points (99.1% liked)

memes

9696 readers
3227 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Corps figured out sustained income was better than marketing and making products. All they had to do was take away every digital product and turn it into a subscription.

Then they'll buy each other up until they are an effective monopoly and raise prices forever.

I don't see a way out of this for products already captured if you need them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

for products already captured if you need them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

There is no real need to use captured products though, so OP's question is flawed.

Any desire to use said products (or not) needs to weigh the pros and cons of the captured products vs alternatives.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

The point is to make an alternative product no one can own/ruin.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago

I don’t see a way out

Free software exists. And if you have any power over a non-small organization, it's also something you can help improve to fit your needs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I think we are seeing that gigantic companies made out of other companies don't function well. People move on eventually

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Problem is, they should realise this only creates a gap for a competitor or even worse (from the companies' perspective) a viable open source project that they'll never be able to compete on price with.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Their solution is to buy them in most cases. It's gets hard to turn down $100M.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

If the licence is already open source then they can't do shit. Unfortunately, they have other methods of discouraging programmers from working on the project, but ultimately open source will prevail.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Remember the "Cable Wars" of yore (the 90's)? Guess who's back... back again?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

[intense saxophone solo]

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

No, the real one is standing up.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago