this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

1673 readers
22 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (15 children)

It’s becoming increasingly common around weekends in France — which gets about two-thirds of its electricity from its atomic fleet

So they occasionally have to take a nuclear plant offline on a sunny and windy day, because we still don't have the storage for solar to be an effective baseline.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (13 children)

Well if that's actually the functioning case, they are investing their effort in the wrong place. They don't need energy production, they need storage.

As far as your comment amount solar, we do have solutions that exist. Energy companies just need to actually get off their asses and work them into the grids.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah storage is sadly difficult and time consuming. I mean if we aren't just using a crap ton of lith-ION.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sodium ion batteries are just about ready for mass production, they take up twice the amount of space as lithium but are just as effective and far cheaper

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

What is your source on that? I heard some news about china making some breakthroughs on sodium ion batteries but I am waiting for independent confirmation on that because, well china has let us down more often than not with “bleeding edge” tech.

I was thinking molten salt would be a better energy sink for the here and now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Hydrogen gets shit on loads, but this is exactly the kind of thing it can do pretty well. When you have excess, you don't need to have to worry about efficiency in the same way. Then it's ready to go once needed.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)