this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

JustGuysBeingDudes

863 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Is that true, though? Your body needs energy for various tasks and those have different mechanisms of spending the energy. Muscles, for example, move, which creates heat. But that heat is not simply breathed out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

The heat is literally produced by oxidizing (burning) carbon that you then breathe out as carbondioxide.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Producing heat isn't where the mass goes though - mass is conserved. You only lose mass to energy in a nuclear reaction.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Something has to go in there, if not losing energy to radiant heat transfer, then how e=m(c^2)?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you mean by in there but yes, the heat would be transferred to the environment.

E=m(c^2) describes how much energy is contained in matter. It's useful for nuclear reactions, but your body isn't a nuclear reactor and you aren't consuming substantial quantities of radioactive isotopes, like uranium ore, that will decay on their own so it isn't relevant here.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Still energy is being radiated. A mass loss has to occur for that