this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

unions

1655 readers
8 users here now

a community focused on union news, info, discussion, etc

Friends:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Jackson was a concurrence, not a dissent, meaning it was 9-0 in reality.

(unless this is a different Starbucks ruling that I haven't seen yet)