Asklemmy

43897 readers

956 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

172

What's an idea you have that should be an actual thing? (lemmy.world)

submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

274 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Tourist cities should have hotel rooms by the hour that are actually clean when you just want to take a nap.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Why not make sure that both are comfortable? The issue is not the reclining seat. The issue is the space in between the seats. So, the issue is the airlines, not the passengers.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but increasing the seat size will increase ticket cost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Well, that's a different argument. The original argument was "permanent seat reclining" and you replied:

Nope, the recline function make almost zero comfort change for the occupant, but for the person behind it has huge impact.

You didn't mention cost until now.