this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
1457 points (98.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26816 readers
2904 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1457
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

(this is not real obviously) artist: Soren Iverson

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 5 months ago (5 children)

See, I have no doubt they would if they could, but i doubt such things are actually feasible.

Like right now I just refresh the page to skip ads on my phone.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

They could.

Default is 60s ad block. However, enabling 'Regular User' feature will bring this down to a more convenient 15s block so you get your content faster every time. To enable this feature, tap Allow when prompted for camera permissions.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I remember playing with a similar feature on my Galaxy S3 back in the day. Eye scrolling. The phone would scroll for you when it sensed you looking at the bottom of the screen. That was the S3. It was not perfect but very usable. My hands always felt faster so I never kept it on but it was a fun thing to play with. I'm sure the only thing stopping them is the fear of backlash. We'll get there in time I'm sure :/

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

The tech exist but enforcing that people use it is another matter. They cannot even properly paywall Picture in Picture and background play on IOS.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's entirely feasible.

Amazon had full head tracking, including gaze, in the Fire Phone a decade ago.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it’s technically feasible, just not practically feasible, like flying cars.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's practically feasible, just not yet deemed profitable enough to do.

Flying cars are not practically feasible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

It’s not practically feasible because people will find ways around it. The app can require an eye tracking features to be turned on, but people will go to the browser site. If they get the people making a browser to integrate it, then people will use another browser. They’d have to block access on any mobile browser that doesn’t enforce it, and that’s a futile effort.

At least on IOS, they tried to lock Picture in Picture and background play behind a paywall, but that only worked in the app, and both features still work for the mobile site with a bit of fussing. Just because they implement restrictions and features doesn’t mean they can actually get them to work enough that people won’t glitch around them.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

I think some vr headsets have them so it’s not like you need a huge package either cus it’s 95% screen

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Them existing and Google being able to enforce people turn them on, and consistently blocking everyone who doesn’t, is a whole other problem that is a lot more complex.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This is why it's dangerous that YouTube's company also makes Android.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hell, phones have them built in. Your iPhone literally knows not to dim the screen if it can see that your eyes are looking at it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This isn’t exposed to the apps, however. Yet…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is the primary reason I switched to iPhone. At least Apple’s business model is rooted in selling me overpriced gadgets rather than selling me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

They do both. ;)