this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
981 points (98.2% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26816 readers
2786 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 75 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

If you believe in God and science empirically proved God didn't exist, would you still believe?

If you don't believe in God, and science empirically proved God exists, would you start to worship it?

I don't believe God exists. But if he was proven to exist, I would believe. I would not, however, worship him. Dude's a prick.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

it depends which god we ended up proving the existence of, if it's prometheus i'd join the movement to free him from his eternal punishment for gifting humanity the fire of innovation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Flying spaghetti monsters, did in fact, create all life in the universe."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

blessed be his noodly appendage

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

The bible should be considered a book of gossip, like an old hollywood rag and accorded such due respect

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

More like a fanfiction basically tumblr of that time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

God's existence, by definition, cannot be proven or disproven. That's the nature of faith and free will (in the theological sense). And that's why there are scientists who believe in God. This American idea that religion and science are opposites makes no sense.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

God's existence, by definition, cannot be proven or disproven. [...] This American idea that religion and science are opposites makes no sense.

What? It sounds like you're contradicting yourself there. Also not sure how that's an "American" idea lol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

sounds like you're contradicting yourself there

Where's the contradiction?

not sure how that's an "American" idea

That's where I heard this perspective from. That you either believe in science or in God, not both. I guess it's because of all the weird Christian denominations in the US that say crazy things and seem to have never actually read the bible, but use it to justify their anti-science ideas.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Effects on the natural world can be scienced.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Of course it can be proven to exist, as long as evidence of its existence exists.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

And what would be the evidence for God's existence? I don't think there'll ever be scientific evidence for God because all events can be explained by science as having occurred naturally, but what if the natural part is made by God?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

In science, anything you can measure is real.

If this god affects nothing measurable on the universe, it might as well not exist

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If "God" is indistinguishable from the natural world, unable to be differentiated from it, to formulate or express thoughts or to influence existence in any way, it is a redundant idea, a zero to the left, and something so alienated from what the vast majority of people consider God is, that the meaning of the concept has already been twisted. It doesn't deserve epistemological effort, because our understanding of the world wouldn't change one bit: rather than it being a wilful intelligence, it would be a carcass over which we happen to live in, which the Universe already is. Even if you were to prove the existence of such a devoid concept, it would be equal to asserting "The Universe exists".

[–] [email protected] 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I would hear his explanation first. The story is full of holes.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

I mean, if Yahweh exists it's not that the story is full of holes so much as that he was part of the Canaanite pantheon and the stories were never originally meant to describe the actions of a singular god.

There is likely a whole mythological cycle that we simply do not have because it was destroyed by zealots for disproving their weird monotheistic fan fiction.

It's like trying to make sense of the Norse sagas if cultists merged all the other gods into Odin, including Loki.