this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
347 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

58996 readers
4227 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

private company in that it is not owned by the government. Those are the two categories.

Either they're owned by the government or they're owned by private citizens. Being traded on the stock market, or traded privately, or not traded at all makes no difference to them being a private company

EDIT: publicly traded still means privately bought and owned by private citizens and private businesses/companies. At no point does the government become involved.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They sure have received a lot of government/taxpayer money for being such a private anti free speech company.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tesla just got $17 billion from the government, is Musk now owned by the USA government? No.

A coal miner just got laid off work and is collecting his first unemployment check while he looks for new work. Because he got support from the government between jobs, does that mean the government owns him like a slave?

Or perhaps you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about? Yes, that seems to be the case.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I'm just saying there can be a case made in front of a judge about the government funding these companies and then using these companies to reprive people of their 1st amendment rights as they have been proven to have done on X.

But whatever you say... Coal miners.... Unemployment.... Between jobs.... Slavery... Wtf are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

as for "what I'm talking about" - the same thing you are. Government giving money.

Tell me, how is the government giving money as an unemployment check different to the government giving money to a company? And if your logic is "if the government gives you money, that means the government owns you, that means 1st amendment", then tell us all how someone who is getting money from the government isn't just as owned and controlled?

Because you're an idiot, that's how.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

There is no case, because they're not the government. End of discussion. 1st amendment has nothing to do here.