this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
furry_irl
1070 readers
1 users here now
for the fur in u
place for shitposting and furry memes
follow pawb.social's guidelines
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So I see Signal recommended instead, but one thing sticks out like a sore thumb. If it's privacy-focused and it has a windows application, why the need for a phone to set it up?
Signal is a terrible recommendation for any basic chat user. The security is solid, but you give up sooooooo much to get there. The desktop apps are garbage as well, they don't even sync chat history.
Why is it a terrible recommendation for a basic chat user? If by "basic chat" you mean SMS or iMessage, it is strictly superior
Sync, system support, hoops to jump through, potential loss of chat history, unreliability, lack of account based sign up (until recently?). So many reasons to not recommend it for people. To clarify though, SMS and iMessage are both so terrible I don't consider them "options". They're defaults for people who have no interest in security or interoperability, which are both major important parts of a chat system imo.
Works fine for me.
Windows, MacOS, Linux, iOS, Android, what more do you want?
What hoops? I typed in my phone number and was good to go.
You said that already. If the worst thing you can say about the messenger is that it doesn't sync chat history to new devices, it's probably a decent messenger.
Genuinely what?
Like I said, if were comparing it to messengers people are already using, like iMessage or RCM, this is a nonissue.