this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Death to NATO

1552 readers
2 users here now

For posting news about NATO's wars in Ukraine, Serbia, Kosovo, and The Middle East, including anywhere else NATO is currently engaged in hostile actions. As well as anything that relates to it.

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you seriously believe that 87% of russian troops have been lost you need to take a long hard look at why you think that’s true. Like think about it, if theyve lost that many troops then why haven’t the battle lines shifted in any meaningful way basically all year ? Why is there no outrage and overflowing graveyards, or increased mobilization in Russia if thats the case ?

Seriously like whatever side of the conflict you’re on aside, if you want any intellectual credibility you gotta think about that one

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Deployed troops, not troop reserves. The estimates are fairly accurate and have been fact checked by multiple intelligence groups. There's burn pits for the bodies of dead Russians, don't exactly need a graveyard when they go up in smoke.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Which intelligence groups? Surely ones with actual credibility, right? Not the ones that lied about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction. Not the ones that lied about covid being a Chinese bioweapon while murdering their own citizens because doing something to protect people from covid would reduce profits. Not the ones that lied about Hamas beheading babies. Any intelligence group that ever spread any of those lies has zero credibility.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Source: “intelligence agencies” that you don’t even name or provide a link to

Evidence: it’s all been burned and so doesn’t exist. The fact the evidence doesn’t exist is proof that it’s true.

Just google it bro

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

The 87% is from the US latest estimate of 315,000 casualties. This lines up fairly well with Ukrainian reports, as well as UK, and AUS reports. Fortunately burn pits are hard to hide from satellite imagery.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You're welcome to cite alternatives! I'll hear your arguments!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

You're the one making the claim, dipshit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Link me something about these satellite images that show “burn pits”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately my access to these images is limited due to the sensitive nature of the military optics involved, however in the future, the ICC will judiciate these war crimes, and the evidence will likely see public eyes.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Just like how the ICC got cold feet after Isisrael was reported to the ICC by South Africa because us-foreign-policy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

So what you're saying is that some people claim there are photos? Then the evidence isn't photos but testimony until those photos are produced

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Wait so in your concept of this war, you see the US as a disinterested neutral observer?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

This really depends on the war/conflict being discussed, but generally speaking the US's global policy is to support democracy and the humane treatment of humans. Respecting this general stance, it's easy to back Ukraine in a defensive manor, protecting the sovereign control from foreign Russian aggression.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Fuck, I remember you now, you're that fucker who made it like two comments into defending that ridiculous thesis a few months ago before turning around and crying to some other instance that I said something that I plainly didn't. I don't remember exactly what it was. I think I discussed the DPRK, but there was something else to it too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As in a 1 or a 0? Generally speaking quantum dynamics dictates a gray area is more in line with today's reasoning.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No need to be hostile, please refrain from the use of language, it doesn't promote thoughtful debate.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

please refrain from the use of language

01001111 01101000 00100000 01100100 01100001 01101101 01101110 00100000 01101101 01100010

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thank you, I was hungry for some bytes! Nom, nom.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

consider biting down on a bullet instead

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Putler woke up one day and his omelette was burnt slightly, so he ordered the sacking of Kiev.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

Honestly understandable sometimes its the smallest thing that sets you off, could see myself doing the same

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Are you okay? Your record may be zkipping.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

You dont know who zenz is huh?

Loser

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

LMAO. Thanks for the laughs at least.