this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
70 points (100.0% liked)

Programming

13362 readers
1 users here now

All things programming and coding related. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (3 children)

In this situation why would anyone actually train their replacement?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Because a lot of people depend on references from their previous job, including their managers and such, for the next one. Burning that bridge because you wouldn’t spend your last few weeks at the company doing what was asked of you is not a good look. It makes you appear difficult/like you hold grudges. It also might cost you things like your severance.

If it’s that important to you to flip a middle finger to your previous employer then go ahead, but I think most people will decide the cons vastly outweigh the pros. Especially since that person will get trained anyway so you can’t even meaningfully change things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Depends on how much Google pays for this, but, yeah, I don't think the ex-employees net-benefit.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yup it probably depends on that. Wouldn't be surprised if they had their stock tied up with it too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Most likely. And in all honesty I’m not sure there’s a better way to try and keep things cordial. Not sure I’d want them to be cordial but..

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Oh I would definitely half ass the transition. "Here are the repos, here's what you need to know, severance now please."

Feel bad for the remote workers, not their fault they're being dropped into this, but they're going to suffer for it