News

23301 readers

3399 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

243

Three women contract HIV from dirty “vampire facials” at unlicensed spa (arstechnica.com)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Trendy, unproven "vampire facials" performed at an unlicensed spa in New Mexico left at least three women with HIV infections. This marks the first time that cosmetic procedures have been associated with an HIV outbreak, according to a detailed report of the outbreak investigation published today.

Ars reported on the cluster last year when state health officials announced they were still identifying cases linked to the spa despite it being shut down in September 2018. But today's investigation report offers more insight into the unprecedented outbreak, which linked five people with HIV infections to the spa and spurred investigators to contact and test nearly 200 other spa clients. The report appears in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

The investigation began when a woman between the ages of 40 and 50 turned up positive on a rapid HIV test taken while she was traveling abroad in the summer of 2018. She had a stage 1 acute infection. It was a result that was as dumbfounding as it was likely distressing. The woman had no clear risk factors for acquiring the infection: no injection drug use, no blood transfusions, and her current and only recent sexual partner tested negative. But, she did report getting a vampire facial in the spring of 2018 at a spa in Albuquerque called VIP Spa.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m saying this is exactly why we need it. I didn’t mean we don’t have it. There are people trying to take away these protections, saying things like, “the market will handle consumer safety.”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I haven't seen any of these people. Where are the people saying the market will handle consumer safety?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Conservatives in the USA push against consumer safety measures. These are just a couple from the first page results for “republicans consumer safety” on DDG:

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/06/13/house-passes-bill-block-gas-stove-ban-00100492

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/10/29/republicans-consumer-product-safety-commission/

If you directly ask them why we shouldn’t have strong consumer safety regulations, they say it’s because it stifles innovation and that the market will correct for unsafe products and services.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Does that mean we can get back the hotdog cooker from the 1970's that electrocuted the weenies?