this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

tumblr

3310 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.

Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
1
I understand not only the what, but the why (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
119 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well replace "company" with "country" and the only arguments you bring forward is about democracy in general being bad. You later argued logistical difficulties with a multi national company, which is a different argument. And I'd concede that there are legitimate arguments against this, but your argument are just very general "demorcacy bad". Lol I'll leave that typo as it is.

I made a very specific argument – people/citizen of a country not being allowed to have a direct say in how the country is run

I think that one political side or the other would vote for their ideology to take control – they would vote for unfettered free speech, which would remove all hate speech laws and so forth.

My central point was that just because I believe government shouldn’t answer to the myriad of voters & citizens they serve doesn’t mean I don’t believe in democracy on a wider scale.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You could replace "company" with "rabbit" and my argument would make no sense.

Does that make me a raving lunatic?

This is what I meant when I said "You sound insane" -- if you change someone's argument to something completely different then IT'S NOT THEIR ARGUMENT ANY MORE and you are entirely misquoting them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

It's called Reductio ad absurdum. If your logic is absurd about people voting in a democracy, then you'd have to provide some rationale why it's not absurd when applied to voting in economic systems. There are good arguments against this.

But your only point was that it would be utter chaos, like it was a given. And that is the same argument authoritarians, monarchists, dictators and plutocrats have been making forever - and are making right now. Right now they are spreading this propaganda around, everywhere. And you picked it up and used it. And that is how they maintain power. That is the actual mechanism of thought control in western "democracies".