this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
455 points (95.2% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2465 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (2 children)

For those who don't know, it's not quite new (except for the word that describes it, Ban Wei 班味). Because of the long working time, a lot of Chinese companies (especially in the tech sector) allow very casual dressing, plushies, even folding beds in the office. Sounds good but is actually horrifying.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

At least read the article before commenting. They're dressing this way on purpose against the wishes of their employers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I'm not saying that this isn't a protest, but merely providing the context for the protest. They took the relaxed dress code to an extreme and deliberately interpreted it as "anything you like". It's more of a malicious compliance protest. That's why they were scolded by the leader, instead of being fired.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Another woman said the best part of wearing her fluffy sweater to work is that she can head straight to bed once she gets home.

"It's so convenient for both work and home. I have essentially reached a state where the office and my home have become one," she said.

It is not protest for the sake of protest, but mostly "convenience".

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

You have completely flipped the context of the quote. It's not just comfort for comforts sake, it's also a way of protesting the 996 work culture of China.

The article is definitely stating that this is a protest, your quote is about a fringe benefit.

Social media users have joked that if you wear your favorite outfit to work, it'll be contaminated by the "Ban Wei" as the office vibe creeps into your personal life.

The remaining option: wear your gross clothes to the office.

Candise Lin who creates content on TikTok exploring cultural trends in China, broke down this viral trend in a recent video.

She used an example of one blogger who said that they only wears clothes with holes in them to work to reflect their "crappy job and shabby pay."

Clearly stated like 2 paragraphs after your quote.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is definitely protest. But they choose these outfit to protest because they are comfortable, as oppose to vampires costume, which would also violate the dress code.

This is related to what OP is saying. These outfit already exists because of toxic work culture, they are taking it to the extreme.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Pick a position and stick with it for more than a single comment:

It is not protest for the sake of protest, but mostly "convenience".

It is a protest using existing social expectations of dress code, it's not just about comfort.

"Protest for the sake of protest" is nonsense. By definition they're doing it for the sake of something. That something is not convenience, it's the 996 work culture like the subject of the article.