this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2024
239 points (97.6% liked)

science

14352 readers
260 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Study suggests social media is key contributor to self-censorship

Most Republican voters support childhood vaccine mandates, yet may be discouraged from publicly expressing these views, a new study suggests.  

To determine the source of this disconnect, researchers conducted a survey that revealed differences between Republican voters who support childhood vaccine mandates and those who do not.

According to the study, most Republicans surveyed supported immunization requirements for children and held favorable attitudes toward vaccine safety, while those who said they opposed vaccine mandates did not acknowledge this support exists – and expressed a greater willingness to share their vaccine views to others. 

In contrast, the Republicans who supported vaccine mandates were largely aware that their views were in the majority, but tended to be less outspoken.

This phenomenon, called the false consensus effect, describes a misperception by people about how widespread their views are and a belief that their opinions are shared by others – when they are not.

“Those in the majority may simply sit out of the conversation because they see online environments as being dominated by extreme views and don’t want to engage in uncivil discourse,” said Dixon. “What’s significant is that those in the majority may self-silence even when they are aware of their majority status.”

The study was recently published in Human Communication Research.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Care to tell us some specific people who you think are extremists in the democratic party? And which particular policy positions you think are extreme?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

There really isnt anything equivalent in the mainstream left. i.e no equivalent to the right's rhetoric about trans people and immigrants.

There are however a few things that would make me hesitate discussing like GMOs and nuclear power.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I've learned to keep my mouth shut when my liberal/progressive friends discuss gun control. The left side of that debate is marbled with misunderstandings, misrepresentations of fact, and flawed reasoning.

Gun control isn't a very important issue to me, but much of the liberal side of the debate just makes me cringe. I've learned to just shut up about it, though, because when I speak up I usually get shouted down and abused for going against the groupthink.

No fucking way I ever vote Republican again, though.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

What you think is the "left side" of that debate... isn't. The two factions you see fighting are both moderates/liberals, but who differ in their level of authoritarianism.

In contrast, actual leftists are folks like the Black Panthers. As the saying goes, "if you go far enough left you get your guns back."