this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
446 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

58144 readers
3953 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
446
Researchers unlock fiber optic connection 1.2 million times faster than broadband (www.popsci.com)
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
99 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is, but it compromises the speed exponentially with length/broadening

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Dispersion compensation and FEC are separate layers of the cake, and work hand in hand.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand why, tho I do not have any kind of expertise here.

I suggest (Haven't read it), this paper proposes to send much denser and broadened signals around one carrier frequency (they use single mode). Due to dispersion they

  1. Start to overlap with one each other. If you put more frequencies, you would have more overlaps and I fail to see how it won't lead to errors.

  2. They all arrive at the broader time window, which again could be mitigated either by error correction, or by extending the time window.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"I haven't read it, but I assume these are things they didn't take into account."

Okay then.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Okay, let's read and find out whether we can find something that we don't know.

  1. There's no paper, there is no letter, it's a simple statement at the institute page. The way science is being communicated nowadays is frustrating.

  2. From the statement

However, alongside the commercially available C and L-bands, we used two additional spectral bands called E-band and S-band. Such bands traditionally haven’t been required because the C- and L-bands could deliver the required capacity to meet consumer needs.

So they indeed broadened the frequency range.

  1. They also did not say anything about limitations. They just pushed this bizarre number everywhere 🤷🏼‍♂️
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

if there is a paper you probably can't read it because it's published behind a pay wall, because fuck normies i guess.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

that's cool. Unfortunately a lot of actual research is still pay walled.