this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
328 points (94.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21291 readers
949 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    I hope these aren't real. I, and most people here, could probably write these codes top to bottom on paper without an eraser or strikethrough parts because we have it fully solved before the interviewer finished the sentence.

    [–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (4 children)

    I mean, it's a hard problem to solve if you never worked with moduli before.

    [–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

    Meanwhile I in school practiced Diffie-Hellman on paper with classmates

    [–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Shouldn't people familiar with integer arithmetic should be able to struggle to something like x == 2 * (x/2) to test if it is odd or even? Or just bitwise x & 1?

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

    If round(x/2) != x/2

    [–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Is it? I would expect someone to come up with either toggling a variable back and forth for even/odd, or counting by 2s, heck, treat it as a floating point, divide by two, and search the string representation for a period or something!

    [–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

    I feel like the floating point suggestion would backfire quickly due to imprecisions.

    [–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    Sure, programming is hard if you've never worked with programming language features before... Modulus isn't some obscure esoteric operator, it's literally CS 101

    [–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

    I fell backwards into programming and did it for years before ever needing or encountering a mod operator. It never really came up in statistical programming (SAS) and since I wasn't a CS major I don't think I even learned about it until taking online programming classes for fun. But I know I was a pretty damn good SAS programmer. I never had any issues solving any problems in my field programmatically, but I took a few leet code tests and was completely puzzled before taking said CS classes. The algorithms and common problems just never remotely came up. I never found fizzbuzz particularly relevant in statistics and data CRUD.

    Now maybe since SAS is procedural and not OO you'd say it doesn't have typical "programming language features", but I could easily see that experience being common in all kinda of business side programming like R, VBA, maybe JavaScript or Python, etc.

    ...but anyway obviously I'm not saying its not a good thing for a dev shop to interview on, and if they want someone classically trained then it's probably a perfect question. My quibble is just that you might need to widen your definition of who programs.