this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5240 readers
428 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
29
IEA Think Tank Contributes to Climate Science Denial Documentary (www.desmog.com)
submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A detailed discussion of how they spent a lot of time engaged in repeating well-worn falsehoods is here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Ya, I read a lot about disasters so when I first read it added an A and thought it was referring to the International Atomic Energy Agency, (IAEA) which studies and helps clean up after radiation incidents like broken or stolen radioactive medical equipment, reactor excursions, and other such incidents.

After I reread the acronym I was like I could swear the IEA was an energy agency that published a lot of stats on green energy and yet their talking about neoconservative economics?

At least think tanks like The (White) Heritage Foundation have somewhat memorable names and don’t use a legitimate organization’s name.