this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

4818 readers
10 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This doesn't seem real.

Dreadlocks would have been extremely abnormal for the period. Hell, it'd be extremely abnormal now.

You sure this isn't some indy photoshoot or AI or something?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not sure if you're serious, and I don't know if the pic is authentic, but I don't see dreadlocks, just thick Asian hair.

Source: I'm Asian and had classmates with the same kind of hair.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The one on the left has half her hair in dreadlocks.

I guess the shutter could have blurred it to look exactly like dreadlocks, but it looks pretty definitive to me

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Believe it or not deadlocks aren't indigenous to modern era afor Americans

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Did I say it was? My point was that it would be very odd in 1945 Japan

Jfc. Nevermind, I'm not getting anywhere in this thread. I guess this isn't a community for discussion, just neat pictures.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

I thought the same thing tbh, but upon zooming in I think it may just be a combo of shadows/sunlight and a shitty 1945 camera. Some of the "dreads" look kinda like normal hair towards the tips.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If anything, it's caked in mud.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

Could be. I tried a reverse image search to find more context, and didn't find anything but posts like this with no citations, starting from 2017.

I'm not convinced it's real.