this post was submitted on 31 Mar 2024
3 points (100.0% liked)

General Discussion

11952 readers
143 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: [email protected]!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse and Feddit Lemmy Community Browser!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to [email protected] or [email protected] communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Transcript:

What the heck is with the "-er" suffix?


"I'm a witcher."

"What does a witcher do?"

"I ~~create~~ ~~watch~~ ~~catch~~ ~~breed~~ ~~f***~~ hunt witches."

"I'm a birder."

"What does a birder do?"

"I ~~create~~ ~~catch~~ ~~hunt~~ ~~breed~~ ~~f***~~ watch birds."

"Actually I think several of those could apply..."


I think the confusing-ass formula is this:

A [word1]er is a [word2]er of [word1]s.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What is "birding"? According to dictionary, it's breed, catch, or watch. Fishers fish, right? What is "to fish" really, though? To swim? To be a fish? I mean, you can't extrapolate it from the common verb as a rule, because that doesn't apply to "birding", does it?

So no, I don't think your over-simplification works.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It's not an over-simplification. This is literally just what the -er suffix does, besides the unrelated usage to make comparisons like "louder". Look up "agent noun" for more info.

What is “birding”? According to dictionary, it’s breed, catch, or watch.

The common usage is to watch birds. The extension of the verb "bird" into "birder" is also commonly understood to mean someone who watches birds.

What is “to fish” really, though? To swim? To be a fish?

What? It means to catch fish. I've never heard any other meaning? Again, it's not based on what a fish does, it's based on what the verb "fish" means, which is to catch fish.

I mean, you can’t extrapolate it from the common verb as a rule, because that doesn’t apply to “birding”, does it?

Ignoring the fact that "bird" is a verb with a fairly well-understood meaning, the reason "birder" or any other -er words are ambiguous is because the verbs are ambiguous. Words have multiple meanings... that's just something that they do. That doesn't change the overall rule that "birder" means "someone who birds", it just means you have to figure out which meaning of "bird" (as a verb) it's using.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Wow, everything I said just went completely over your head. Just because you already know what "to fish" means doesn't mean that it can be extrapolated from the word by someone who doesn't already know what it means.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

No, everything you said was addressed and then you brought up a different issue that was supposedly your real point all along (and that I did also address). I see you've opted for the wheeled goalposts for easier mobility. Is this an April Fool's prank?

To be clear: You wanted to know what "fisher" means. The answer is that it means "someone who fishes". If you also don't know what the verb "fishes" means, then you can go look it up in the dictionary like any other word you don't know the meaning of. But "fisher" has a perfectly clear meaning based on the verb "fish" (or multiple potential meanings based on context, if "fish" as a verb has multiple meanings).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That is literally not consistent with the way many of these words work. That's the entire point of the post. I have no clue how you don't understand that. You are over-simplifying. How many examples of this not being how it works do you want me to look up for you right now? Hell, you got one in goddamned front of you. "Bird" is not a freaking verb— not in relation to the animal, anyway.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes it is! It's just not one you recognize!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Okay, listen. You're saying "birder" is "someone who birds birds". And? What does "to bird" even mean? According to the dictionary, it means TO OBSERVE, not literally TO BIRD. And what is a fisher? "A person who fishes fish"? And what does "to fish" mean? TO CATCH. Not TO OBSERVE this time. That means that verbing a noun is not consistent. You could argue "A [noun]er is a person who [same-noun-but-used-as-a-verb]s [first noun]s" all day, but what does that effing really mean when that verb is different every time?

I really, really don't know how to break this down simpler for you, okay? The meaning is inconsistent, and cannot be known without being told, which means can't be extrapolated at all. That's the freaking point. Already knowing the meaning of words is not the same as extrapolating them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You're adding an extra noun! It's not "someone who verbs nouns", it's just "someone who verbs". Example: A birder is not "someone who birds birds", it's just "someone who birds", with "bird" meaning "to observe birds". This is easier to see with simpler nouns. Welder = someone who welds. Racer = someone who races. Yodeler = someone who yodels. Singer = someone who sings. The meaning is inconsistent because the verb is different every time! You're not being given a noun and have to guess the verb. You're being given the verb directly. If you don't know what that verb means then yeah you have to look it up, just like EVERY OTHER WORD IN EXISTENCE.

Edit:

I really, really don’t know how to break this down simpler for you, okay?

You can keep saying stuff like this but every time you do I only relish the irony.

Anyways I decided an example that can't even have a noun might be helpful. This works with any intransitive verb, but the best example I have is probably "worker" = "someone who works". You could also use "yawner", "laugher", "walker", "carer", etc.