this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)
Videos
14315 readers
174 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to [email protected] instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
Note: bans may apply to both [email protected] and [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This seems like an obvious concern, I'm not sure why the armchair philosopher is shitting their armchair over this.
Right, so legislate that critical equipment is required to use certified repairs. Easy-peasy, lemon-squeezie. We don't require airplanes to be thrown away and repurchased every time maintenance is due, we require the maintenance to be certified.
I believe that is exactly what this article is recommending.
That's not a valid concern, and even if it was, blocking right to repair laws does nothing to prevent it.
I didn't see that they were blocking right to repair laws.
He addressed that at 2:30 and 4:35. The lobbyist is purposefully misrepresenting the reality of third party repair services in the medical field. Restricting repair access puts more people's lives at risk.
He said that immediately after noting they have no experience in medicine or medical devices.
I do and it is a genuine concern that the hospitals that are not funded well enough to make these repairs and will have the most pressure to do so.