this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
20 points (100.0% liked)
World News
22057 readers
135 users here now
Breaking news from around the world.
News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
For US News, see the US News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Mondoweiss? Really?
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mondoweiss/
Take a look at Times of Israel in MBFC
Amongst other things it says:
This is not a joke, just check it out.
I'm not familiar but I just went and looked over their front page, and all I can say is wow. My favorite story was: "Why we must embrace the UN ceasefire resolution: Ramadan will be over before we know it, and we can use the time to regroup, train, and buy some international good-will along the way."
This is incredibly notable, too. Saying Israel has "moderate freedom" is like saying apartheid South Africa had moderate freedom, with quite literally the 100% exact same little invisible asterisk after the statement.
Hm.. maybe. I'm not real familiar with them, so maybe they bend the truth to fit the viewpoint sometimes and it's a bad idea to rely on them. But, just looking at this one story I didn't see the viewpoint as all that different from a just mirror image of a factual-but-pro-Israel narrative in an ordinary Western paper. I thought just thought it was useful information about "how much does this resolution actually mean, what might make it enforceable, how much has it changed anything on the ground as of now (i.e. fuck all)" and such.
My concern with going case-by-case with articles from a generally non-credible publication is that even if this one is fine, it gives their other stuff undeserved legitimacy.
YMMV, but I feel that generally muddies the waters and does more harm than good.
Yeah, I feel you on that; it's a fair point.