this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Asklemmy

43790 readers
764 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The Internet.

That'd remove the circuses from our bread and circuses... and some of us are out of bread

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I can see the plus side of being able to identify bots, I don't think the WEI is the right way to do it, and Google definitely isn't the right company to be handling it

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plus how do you spot the difference between a good bot and a bad bot? Web crawlers from search engines are for example inherently good, so they should still be able to operate, but if it is easy to register a good bot in WEI, it is also easy to register a bad bot. If it is hard to register a good bot, then you're effectively gatekeeping the automated part of the internet (something that actually might be Google's intention).

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I was thinking the same thing about Google wanting their bots to be the only ones allowed to crawl and index the internet.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)