this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

Technology

59095 readers
3301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Do you support sustainability, social responsibility, tech ethics, or trust and safety? Congratulations, you’re an enemy of progress. That’s according to the venture capitalist Marc Andreessen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Industrialization happened because of capitalism.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Industrialization in the USSR didn't happen? Damn. Where did all those nuclear power plants come from, then? What about that massive agricultural surplus? How did they develop their own computer technologies?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m amazed that you chose the three worst things you could have picked from the USSR. They literally stole their nuclear tech from the capitalists, did not believe in genetics, period, and created famines from their poor understanding of environmental science and lack of flexibility (Gigantic centralized serf farms are bad if the local weather isn’t ideal! , and their computers were trinary garbage that barely functioned.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

They literally stole their nuclear tech from the capitalists

Soviets had a hydrogen bomb before their Western peers.

What's more the world's first nuclear power station at Obninsk was connected to the Moscow grid in June of 1954. The Soviets outpaced their American peers in nuclear power, rocketry, and advanced electronics well into the 1970s.

did not believe in genetics, period

That's flatly untrue. And it completely neglects their role in eliminating smallpox during the 1950s.

created famines from their poor understanding of environmental science and lack of flexibility

https://www.nytimes.com/1983/01/09/world/cia-says-soviet-can-almost-do-without-imports.html

the average Soviet citizen consumes about 3,300 calories a day, as against 3,520 for an American. The report showed that the Soviet diet consists of far more grain and potatoes than the American diet, but less fish and meat and less sugar.

They ended famine in Asia. A continent that suffered mass famine every ten to fifteen years was fully fed through domestic agricultural production by the end of the 1960s.

Stalin was so stacked with grain in the 50s that he was bailing out the English colonies throughout India and Bangledish.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol, no steam engines without stealing from the worker, got it. 🙄

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, around that time, I'm pretty sure steam engines were literally considered 'stealing from the worker'.

The same with many other forms of mechanisation.

It's not that the luddites were wrong, just that they were easily beaten, because humans can't compete.

There are critics and cynics, but the same is happening now around AI.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's not a worker in the world who will vote away their own job.

Unchecked control of the workers for industry will harm us all. We don't need socialism we need strong unions.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s not a worker in the world who will vote away their own job.

The fuck are you talking about? This happens all the time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No it doesn't, historically people have literally burned down factories and assaulted those who were replacing their jobs.

There's not a factory in the world with any significant number of workers that find some new innovation that makes all those workers obsolete where the workers go "oh yeah, let's do that"

There are absolutely zero incentives for a worker too to support such a thing. If you think they're going to somehow magically vote against their own interest and act in favor of the common good no matter the situation....

Well that's very socialist thinking from you.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Literally every Red state in the US is a a group of people voting away their own jobs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you missed the Republican opposition to climate change? Have you missed Republican opposition to globalization in recent years?

Those didn't come out of thin air. They come out of many towns across the country whose entire economy once relied on things like mining coal and heavy dirty industry which was all shipped out to China. They are 100% voting in favor of their jobs still.

Also remember that under socialism we are not talking about country level decisions, we are talking about factory level decisions which will largely be decided by the workers. Unless an issue becomes important enough that it becomes a nationwide issue that gets a vote for the larger popular vote, 90% of technologies are going to get trashed.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

bro lemmy.ml is that way ->