this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
290 points (98.3% liked)
Asklemmy
43397 readers
1170 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
You shold look into zero-k as well. I started out with BAR but found out zero-k more engaging
That's a continuation of TA Spring? Neat, played that a looong time ago.
oh wow, didn't know about that. I did play TA a lot (I mean, I still play it sometimes, big bertha feels sooo good!). But yes, the idea behind them is pretty much the same as TA
Could you elaborate on why zero-k is better than BAR in your opinion?
it's about the single player storyline. It feels like BAR is more geared towards online/multiplayer, while zero-k has a proper full single player campaign. Don't get me wrong, I played with BAR for quite some time and it's still a great game, I just "clicked" better with zero-k.
Ah cool, didn't know that Zero-K had a whole campaign going on. I think we're kinda opposites though, because I really don't enjoy the RTS campaign gameplay experience. I'd much rather play against bots (or maybe online).