this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
158 points (93.4% liked)
Memes
4028 readers
1 users here now
Good memes, bad memes, unite towards a united front.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I haven't only read Wikipedia, I've read things such as interviews from former Chinese citizens saying that Google was banned, and on their search engine the tiennamen square never existed. Also, how is China becoming more communist? The government getting profits from wage-slavery isn't becoming more communist, it's becoming the center of capitalism. Even if the government weren't making direct profits from wage-labor, they still make profits from things like taxes and corporations buying land. When the government is making profits from capitalism, they won't go socialist.
You do know the Tiennamen square is the literal most famous place in China right?
It's the place where there is this super famous building that is one of the country's symbol and that almost every content about China ever can't help but have at least one picture of.
So saying that the name of the place is censored in China is completely ridiculous.
As pointed out by others, the event that you are referring to is known in China as the june 4th incident so yes, of course if you type Tiennamen in the search bar you won't find it, when you look up something on a non-english website maybe try to look up how the thing you're looking for is called in the site's language instead of assuming it's called the same way in english you westernbrained monkey.
It's literally in the country official coat of arms that is used everywhere lol
not even close, really demolishing your own credibility and claims to have read anything
天安门工厂 is a place, not an event. btw in China it's called "June 4th Incident" and common knowledge, easily findable on Baidu.
The Tiananmen Square ‘Massacre’: The West’s Most Persuasive, Most Pervasive Lie.
Hyperbole.
And here the smug lib employs the "one word response" tactic, where they ignore everything you've said in your attempt to educate them so they can give a snappy comeback, which makes them believe they've won the argument.
-checks another one off the bingo list-
And this one, a classic tankie argument, where they don't engage in what I said but rather its format, thereby not acknowledging that I was engaging in hyperbole, not saying that the Chinese government erased mention of the landmark.
keeps sucking my own dick -
Enjoy your auto-fellatio in a solipsistic cocoon. Once you consume the seed of the self, you can contort your head up your anus to smell the wonderful odors of you recycling your own contents and never letting anything in.
You were proven wrong not just about your claim of erasure of the landmark, you were also proven regarding what you tried to say. Crying "tankie" does not make you less of an idiot.
Calm down, accept that you were lied to and learn.
Hold on ain't no way did you just accuse us of not engaging with what you said LMFAOOOOOOOOOOOO 😭😭😭 you're a troll and should be mocked and treated as such
Why do you enjoy sucking your own dick?
Because I don't have the reading comprehension skills of a fucking carrot.
Well yes, that is apparent. I do know a variety of vegetable more well-read.
...look I know they're banned but I can't help it.
Why do you not have the reading comprehension of a fucking carrot?
Please, I want to go to fucking bed it's 5 am—I started my pc again to write this to you—, stop making an ass of yourself, it's too funny, it's too interesting to see how badly you can post.
... I can't. I'm at a loss for words.
Go to bed Edward
So what? They banned google as protectionism, this way their infant tech sector didn't have to compete with an already established monopoly. Now China has their own alternatives to all these google services, and the profits of these industries don't go to the West but stay in China. Plus the infrastructure is in China so it's not a security risk.
China is in an early stage of socialism, with a primary goal of developing the productive forces. They have introduced market elements into their economy in a controlled manner to accelerate their development of the productive forces. Taxes don't banish into politicians pockets, financial paradises or into the MIC like in the west, it goes into development.
Communism is a stage of development, you can't just push a button and become communist, it is a process that takes decades of work and correct policy to build.
No decommodification, no worker owned capital. The US is in an early version of socialism too I guess.
Edit: guys it's called sarcasm
aight little bro tell me how that works out
You see why reading the books is important? Cause you avoid saying dumb shit like this
Edit: mans said they were being sarcastic, cause sarcasm is when you're just straight up incorrect and can't back it up lmao
Maybe you should do your own research. Open report number 590 on this page: https://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-11/09/content_1989024.htm
Oh look, what is it? The report of the State Council published on June 25, 1989 about the protests, from gov.cn themselves!
Oh no how horrible, literally 1997. Can't live without my google, especially when I don't have a much better replacement such as Baidu. Nope, don't exist. Only Google. Well, since 1998 only.
Are you denying that Google is a repository of information. Even duckduckgo is banned. They're not even close to a monopoly. I'm making the point that they're restricting information. Also I'd be happy to read article 590 if you could provide me with an English translation.
how is banning Google restricting information and why did you not touch on the State Council report about the 1989 Beijing protests?
Since there is an edit: you can OCR the document and run it into an online translator. The State Council of the People's Republic of China writes, understandably, in Chinese.
I was wondering if something like that would lose some meaning as things like that are infamously inaccurate.
Would you trust a human-made translation if someone made it? The only people that would care enough to go through the document and manually translate it would be Marxist-Leninists who want to prove a point. I doubt Maoists for example, who consider the Deng government revisionist, would take the time to translate a document that vindicates the 1989 government.
Sure, do you have one?
https://lemmygrad.ml/post/1252700
Thank you
so how's the reading going
I'm reading it when I wake up tomorrow, for now I'm not responding to you specifically.
I know what you mean. But I am going to take it at it's litteral value, because it is so much funnier to think that someone said "Tiananmen square doesn't exist"