this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)
Futurology
1779 readers
4 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is bad news only for the capitalist ideology of endless growth.
But they keep telling me it's gone anyway and I'll never see it. I don't see how that makes anything worse.
Wow that never crossed my mind. Totally see it now since they constantly talk about gutting it. Jerks are always late game planning.
Well regardless I rather have happy wanted children in the world than unwanted ones. I am curious if the reduction of unwanted children will lead to less financial waste in long run.
Shrinking population is economically harmful regardless of your economic system
Yep.
✅Good for the planet. ✅Good for societies and humans in general. ✅Good for wildlife. ✅Good for our longevity as a species. ❌Bad for people who exploit others to gain money and resources.
Good. I'm glad there will be an unexplainable reckoning coming these unapologetically savage fuckers.
The problem is that you will end up with a massive shortage of man power. Automation may fill in the gaps but at the end of the day you will end up with a labor shortage.
There also is the problem of not having enough people to take care of the elderly. We are slowly moving to a future where the majority of the population is old and grey
Again, a duly needed change. Less people means less everything, so less need for so much bullshit to produce and consume. Less overall is a good thing.
The problem is with the sudden changes. Its fine to have a population change gradually
The other thing it's bad for is getting exceptional people. If you need 1 in a million people it's easier the more millions of people you have
It's already plenty bad how many stay in poverty their whole life, wealth inequality is a much bigger barrier than a raw count of people. Most of those one in a million never get an opportunity to make a difference just because of where they started
I thought the current conclusion is: we're at the tipping point now that would allow most wildlife to persevere. We need to be changing course now or yesterday to save the majority of even most if any at all. There are efforts, but most habitats are on course for nearly irreversible modifications. Humanity will survive, at the cost of other wildlife on the planet.
Well that's about disastrous decimation of wildlife due to climate change, which is technically a separate thing. I was just commenting on the obvious fact that less humans means better outcome overall for the planet and wildlife.
But muh shareholder value
Remember that one time shareholder value fell through the floor and it only hurt the capitalists? Yeah, that never happened.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression