Conservative
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
view the rest of the comments
TF is this shit? Someone take an article about trump and just make convenient substitutions?
Ah, PJ Media. Just another right wing commentary site known for gems like execs making antisemitic comments, accusing Obama of hiding documents in a furniture warehouse, or suggesting a US senator told Iran to target trump hotels.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PJ_Media
Good point. When you don't like the facts... just question the source. That's solid intelligent thinking. And actually examining the facts is just too much work.
The source is always important. If a broken clock is right twice a day you’d better be sure I check that it’s wrong the other 86,398 times a day when someone might try to read me the time off of it. So while this rag PJ Media may be right occasionally, it’s wrong in so many other ways it’s not worth using as a source for any reasonable discussion. Speaking of examining the facts it’s plain you didn’t even bother to read the wiki on the site describing why it’s crap.
disagree. the source tells you something. Then those with and IQ above 40 independently research on their own if the source was credible in what they said. Of course if I wanted to repress free speech I would just scream the source is bullshit rather than deal in facts. The NYT and Wash Post lied to you for over 2 fucking years about the russia, russia hoax. Even the left had to give up pushing the lie when the truth was revealed. Did the leftist media even once apologize to you for lying to for over 2 years. Of course not. That tells you what they think of their audience. They believe them to be all in on whatever lies they are told because they refuse to research the facts
Really. Then I suggest you fill your library with national enquirer, New York Post, Examiner, and every other rag that’s suitable to your IQ because you don’t even give a crap that I said I’d verify something that was told to me. But whatever. Stop butwhatabouting me. We’re discussing what you wrote and the source you cited. Fuck off if you can’t admit it’s bullshit and that sources need to be trustworthy.
Just reported you for being uncivil. Adults debate. Grammar school kids name call and scream at those who disagree with them
Good for you. It's nice when you win an argument by reporting someone instead of actual facts. Have a nice day.
I really need you to take a look at his/her profile. Check out their NSFW questions. Just for fun.