Europe

202 readers
5 users here now

All about Europe

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
101
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/59793780

102
103
 
 

cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/24595976

Archive: https://archive.is/2025.03.29-083158/https://www.ft.com/content/218efe0d-e4a8-4f5b-ae96-de46e64dcb89

France, Ireland and Europe’s powerful farming unions are pushing Brussels to drop many food and drink products from its proposed retaliation against US tariffs.

The European Commission has received floods of objections from business and member states to its list of measures, underlining how the 27 member block might struggle to respond collectively to US pressure.

Jack Chambers, Ireland’s public expenditure minister, warned against “retaliatory and tit-for-tat measures that could worsen a trade dispute” on Friday while Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni told the FT the EU should negotiate over its high duties on some items. 

“There are big differences on the single goods,” she said. “That’s what we have to work on to find a good, common solution.”

104
 
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/20131463

Archived

[Op-ed by Tauno Tõhk, Research Fellow at the International Centre for Defence and Security (ICDS) since October 2024, specialising in China and Chinese foreign interference. Before joining the ICDS.]

The current EU approach is structured according to the 2019 “Strategic Outlook on China,” a document providing a framework for EU-China relations.

...

However, despite persistent China-related security issues, security concerns are largely absent from the Strategic Outlook, the key document shaping EU-China relations. Since it was adopted, Europe’s security landscape has changed dramatically, particularly due to Russia’s illegal military aggression against Ukraine. China’s backing of Moscow’s war efforts directly undermines European security. However, it is important to recognise that the security challenges China poses to the EU extend beyond its support for Russia, encompassing a range of well-documented hybrid activities.

... Despite repeated claims of neutrality, China has become a “decisive enabler” of Russia’s illegal military aggression against Ukraine. It provides dual-use goods, helps to circumvent sanctions, and facilitates Russia’s hybrid operations. [...]

  • China’s role as a “circumvention hub” for EU’s sanctions against Russia, acting as both a supplier to Russia and a transit route for western products.
  • Chinese entities have been sanctioned by the EU for supplying drone and microelectronic components to Russia. Chinese officials and state-controlled media have provided a platform for Russia’s talking points and disinformation narratives.
  • China has criticised sanctions against Russia and regularly accused the west of starting and fuelling the war.

The security challenges China poses to the EU extend beyond its support for Russia

In diplomatic engagements with China, the EU and individual member states have consistently emphasised China’s support to Russia as a key irritant in EU-China relations.

...

A Threat to Security and Values

Beyond its support for Russia, China poses a challenge to European security in and of itself. This includes potential conflicts over Taiwan and the South China Sea, hybrid activities targeting EU member states, and weaponising economic and trade links for political purposes.

A conflict in the Indo-Pacific would have global ramifications. The report by Special Adviser to the President of the European Commission Sauli Niinistö calls the potential economic and security impact of Chinese aggression against Taiwan or in the South China Sea “staggering” for Europe, likely triggering opportunistic behaviour from Russia against an EU member state.

...

National threat assessments confirm China’s targeting of the EU.

  • The Swedish Security Service considers China, alongside Russia and Iran, as the greatest threat to Sweden’s security, stating that Beijing attempts to influence Stockholm’s decision-making.
  • The Danish Defence Intelligence Service notes that China is trying to sow discord between European countries to weaken the EU’s unity, for example, when mitigating risks of cooperation with China.
  • The Belgian security service similarly claims China is trying to damage intra-European relations.
  • Germany’s domestic intelligence services state that China seeks to create a favourable environment outside its borders for the Communist Party’s objectives and looks for influential political figures to speak in favour of Chinese interests.

[...]

Western cyber security agencies have attributed cyber activities targeting European governments and lawmakers critical of Beijing as well as naval research activities and technology development to China’s state-sponsored threat actors. The EU has sanctioned individuals and organisations associated with APT10, a group linked to China’s Ministry of State Security.

...

The EU should acknowledge this reality and explicitly label China a security challenge.

...

Several member states’ security services already list China among the primary security threats, especially given Beijing’s close alignment with Moscow. Officially recognising these concerns at the EU level would help forge consensus on China policy. It also shields member states from the ramifications of acting alone and facing potential Chinese retaliation in isolation, allowing them to rely on a unified stance when calling out Chinese activities that endanger European security.

...

105
 
 

cross-posted from: https://europe.pub/post/73260

106
 
 

cross-posted from: https://europe.pub/post/73255

107
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/59729715

108
 
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/9822843

109
 
 

Both have a history of EU candidacy: Norway withdrew after referenda in 1972 and 1994, while Iceland suspended accession talks in 2015 after applying in 2009. Notably, in 2024, Iceland’s governing Social Democratic Alliance pledged to hold a referendum by 2027 on resuming EU negotiations.

110
111
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/31373910

What emerges is that despite their different focal points, support for European values serves as a common denominator for most of these movements. What unites them is their opposition to corruption, democratic backsliding, and the concentration of power in the hands of elites.

[...]

These movements share important characteristics despite their different national contexts. All emerged in response to specific events: a train station collapse in Serbia, a pedophilia scandal in Hungary, a secret meeting with Putin in Slovakia, the rise of far-right euroscepticism in Romania, and the halting of EU negotiations in Georgia. Despite these different triggers, they all reflect deeper grievances about governance, with corruption and abuse of power emerging as common themes.

[...]

The European Union, in its own interest, should provide much clearer support to these movements rather than maintaining diplomatic distance or prioritizing short-term stability. By standing firmly with citizens who embody its core values on the streets, the EU would not only strengthen its moral authority but also invest in the democratic future of the entire continent. These courageous demonstrators are not just fighting for their own countries—they represent the living heart of the European project itself.

112
 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/31224643

Archived link

Kallas and the foreign ministers of the 27 EU Member States discussed the potential financial gap for Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty at their monthly meeting in Brussels.

The Estonian politician, who grew up behind the Iron Curtain, described as “sad” the news that the US government is withdrawing its financial support for the radio station, which she called a “beacon of democracy.”

[...]

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty was founded in the early years of the Cold War to promote democratic values to listeners in Eastern Bloc countries and the Soviet Union.

[...]