wowyoureallysaidthat

joined 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It’s American individualism, man. Bad for us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Totally agree with you. I just wish the internal party crisis that’s happening in the Dems wasn’t happening because it makes me think that Trump will win. It’s hard because I get WHY it’s happening — but this is the shit that keeps me up at night. My kids deserve far fucking better (we all do).

Fuck white supremacy, anyway.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Right. I really fucking hate this dude is sending weapons to fund a genocide. But do I want to not vote or let some asshole who is going to make Americans life harder get the most powerful position in the world? Absolutely the fuck not. No one should be having to make these decisions, but here we are.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It does appear that why though when we are essentially facing a dictatorship from a GOP candidate. Not saying that you’re not correct, but having a moral conundrum on the only reasonable party candidate we have right now doesn’t seem the right answer. But, I’m purely thinking of my kids future — what future they may have after this election.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It does seem inevitable in the systems that we have built that you eventually sell out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You are describing how the American political process works. So would you rather them not vote or support the candidate that aligns with their policies or values? I'm very unclear on what you’re positioning here.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, Democract elites, they suck, blah blah.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I think “connection” can be very subjective depending on who you’re talking to, and I think this conversation needs a lot more nuance than perhaps is being given to it. I think by not lending credence to how we form connections and bonds with these political figures through emotion, we are trying to act like that it doesn’t exist (or shouldn’t), which isn’t true. The article here seems more to be pointing out that liberal women have lost their fathers to far-right ideology, not so much that they are now attaching that lost relationship to Walz. It seems more as though Walz helped these women come to terms with this fact, or enlightened them to it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Thanks for this, I literally used a cliche such as the ones listed in a previous comment, though I did not realize I was using one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

I don’t think there is anything wrong about coming to your own conclusions from public figures about the ways in which your personal relationships have been impacted by said public figures. Yes we don’t know these people directly but they impact and shape our lives, sometimes without us even knowing it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Hey, so I am by no means an expert but have experience in environmental public health. We talk a lot about risk mitigation. A lot of people smarter than me measure what chemicals are appropriate levels in certain products. Because while yes, it is true that no amount of lead is good for you, there are so many factors that come into play that you have to contend with the fact that there will be a number of chemicals that will be occurring within our environment that can’t always be controlled, so they end up in our products. It’s a really fascinating field, I have a textbook recommendation that’s really good if anyone is interested - it isn’t open-source, though. :/

view more: next ›