This would be an improvement with cars, not a problem with cars.
“The people are right to not trust a science they can’t pronounce”
One of the basic arguments against "Ultraprocessed Fods" (UPF)... I shit you not.
Michael Pollan: If You Can't Say It, Don't Eat It : NPR
2.) If You Can't Say It, Don't Eat It
Don't buy products with more than five ingredients or any ingredients you can't easily pronounce.
Privileged twits are a huge danger, yes.
Monty Python - Upper Class Twit Of The Year https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGxSM5y7Pfs
Is the railway system for his personal use? Rail is good if it's public transport (and cargo). There was a tradition, some time ago, of rich people getting their own railways and trains. But now they have jets and yachts.
This would be a good idea with lots of room for improvement. For example, geolocating the car and making the price go x1000 if in a "no honking" zone. What we really need is cars that self-report to road authorities when driving over the speed limit.
Deadly carbrain contagion
Yes! Now convince the car fanboys clamoring for electric cars to switch.
What is misleading?
Do corporations produce those GHGs for fun? For their shareholders? Are the coal bonfires at company getaways? Do they build castles for shareholder using ruminant bones as a construction material? Do they use oil to build deadly oil swamps for obscure reasons? Or do they embed and package those GHG emissions to sell something to some buyer?
Fuck Carpitalism
trillionaires
why such a high ceiling?
It averages out. Keep a clean record for a set interval and you get discounts.
You think I'm joking, but car insurance companies are going to do all of these things, and not for public health. Smart cars are especially big leaks of personal data.